|
Food, Inc.
Talking Points |
|
Food Inc. Talking Points
Overview: The "documentary" Food, Inc. supposedly "lifts the
veil on our nation's food industry, exposing the highly mechanized
underbelly that has been hidden from the American consumer with the
consent of our government's regulatory agencies, USDA and FDA."
According to the film's original website trailer: "Our nation's food
supply is now controlled by a handful of corporations that often put
profit ahead of consumer health, the livelihood of the American farmer,
and the safety of workers and our own environment. We have
bigger-breasted chickens, the perfect pork chop, insecticide-resistant
soybean seed, even tomatoes that will not go bad, but we also have new
strains of e coli ‒ the harmful bacteria that causes illness for an
estimated 73,000 Americans annually. We are riddled with widespread
obesity, particularly among children, and an epidemic level of diabetes
among adults."
While the assertions above reasonably reflect what the film is about,
there are many inaccuracies both in the film and in the direction that
it leads the viewer that must be addressed.
Synopsis of the film: The film targets companies including
Smithfield Foods, Tyson, Perdue, and Monsanto, as mega multinationals
that have undue power in agriculture and food markets, claiming that
they "control" everything from seed to plate. After various stories,
video clips, and several interviews (notably not with
scientific experts) the film implies that these companies are
responsible for the overuse of corn in U.S. food production resulting in
higher likelihood of food borne illness, obesity, and declining numbers
and market power of farmers.
The film concludes by recommending consumers know more about the food
they eat, buy organic products, keep business local, and show support
for farmers. The first conclusion is a no-brainer and perhaps the most
significantly positive contribution of the film. The final conclusion
regarding farmers is very appreciated by the production community.
Buying organic or local are consumer choices and should be informed
choices because they do not always deliver the benefits consumers
believe.
While the film primarily attacks large multinational agricultural and
food corporations, the less than accurate information and assumptions
upon which the film is based negatively affect one's perception of the
food system including many modern farming practices. This is a dangerous
result in a nation that boasts the gold standard for food safety and
efficient food production.
Missing messages: While makers of the film seem to side with some
advocates who would reduce consumer choice to promote their own food
philosophies, they miss some key attributes of the U.S. food system.
U.S. consumers are fortunate to have many safe and nutritious
food choices that are the product of a dedicated system of farmers
and ranchers, manufacturers and retailers, government and academia
all working to produce a safe, nutritious, bountiful harvest that is
the envy of most of the world.
While the U.S. food safety system can always be improved, it is
the model regarded as the gold standard by most nations of the
world. Our food is as safe or safer than any country of equal scale
in the world.
The U.S. will export an estimated $96 billion worth of food in
2009 to countries around the world who do not have the ability to
grow it themselves. The entire world, not just the U.S., relies on
successful U.S. agricultural production.
Key Inconsistencies in the Film
|
Inconsistency |
Fact |
| A
"deliberate veil" is being held over the food industry and farmers
aren't allowed to talk. |
·1 Information on U.S. food, food
companies, and most production systems is publically available
from the company, industry associations, the regulatory agencies,
and farm groups.
·2 The movie tries to deliberately
exploit consumers' ignorance about production agriculture and food
production, processing, and preparation.
·3 Farmers are some of the industry's
most powerful spokespersons. Many farmers are able and eager to
tell consumers how they produce food.
|
| Modern farms
(dubbed corporate/factory farms) use practices that harm the
environment and produce inferior food. |
·4 Over 96% of all farms in America are
family farms. Family farms can be large, small, or somewhere in
between.
·5 No matter the size of the farm,
farmers know that a healthy environment and healthy animals make
for healthy food for consumers.
|
| There are
insecticide-resistant soybeans and by implication, this is strange
or bad. |
·6 The majority of soybeans grown in
the U.S. are not insecticide-resistant, they are
herbicide-tolerant. This means they may be treated with modern
herbicides, allowing farmers to control weeds with little or no
tillage.
·7 Modern herbicides are much more
benign than other products and methods used in the past to control
weeds.
|
| The U.S.
food system is "controlled" by a few corporations that put profit
ahead of the American consumer, farmer, and the environment. |
·8 The U.S. food system developed and
evolved to meet the needs of changing consumer preferences and
trends.
·9 Such trends and preferences are
transmitted to the food industry and retailers via annual surveys
(most of which are publically available).
·10 Each year, the food companies and
retailers use the results of the surveys to develop new products,
marketing ideas, etc.
·11 Large food companies did not create
and do not control the food system.
|
| The U.S.
food system is more dangerous and monopolistic because the companies
are large. |
·1 More Americans work away from home and
eat away from home, thereby demanding quick meals and convenience.
·2 Americans like branding and
consistency resulting in large companies and marketing firms
having brand power over "mom and pop" outlets.
·3 Size equals economic efficiency in the
food industry just as in others.
·4 Food companies are owned by
shareholders/consumers who demand a profit on their investment.
Decisions made on behalf of those shareholders' profit interests
can hardly call it innate corporate greed.
|
| Farm
policies created cheap corn and soybean-based food ingredients and
products that are causing obesity and health problems for our
society. |
·5 Corn and soybeans are two of the least
supported U.S. crops.
·6 The American Medical Association, the
American Dietetic Association, and others agree that ingredients
like high fructose corn syrup are not the cause of obesity or
related health concerns.
·7 Rather, increased caloric intake along
with little or no exercise is the primary cause of obesity.
·8 The modern food system provides
American consumers with the most affordable and wholesome food in
the world.
|
| Food in
today's system is more unsafe, dangerous, or full of e-coli than in
the past.
(The movie implies that cows fed corn in feedlots and processed
by large companies are more likely to result in e-coli contamination
in hamburger and other products).
|
·9 Consumers' knowledge about food
storage and preparation, has declined markedly in the past 30
years. This results in greater chance for human error in food
choices and preparation.
·10 The amount of time and the methods
used (e.g., microwaves) have changed considerably, requiring
consumers to increase (not decrease) knowledge and vigilance.
·11 Many of the estimated 76 million
cases of food-borne illnesses in the U.S. are contracted in the
home, and many can be prevented through proper kitchen health,
storage, and cooking.
·12 By their nature, food systems are
biological and thus not failsafe. However, we are improving food
safety all the time, particularly through reporting and tracing
when food problems occur.
·13 Twelve years ago, the CDC improved
its data collection of food-borne illnesses; the result: a 25%
decline in E. coli ailments. Other bacterial infections are down
by about 33%.
·14 The majority of food borne illnesses
attributed to e-coli comes at some point in the food chain outside
of the slaughter facility.
·15 The movie implies that organic foods
are less likely to contain e-coli or other contaminants. This is
simply not true, the e-coli outbreak in California
spinach in 2006 was caused in and by an organic process.
·16 The movie implies that cows fed corn
instead of grass have increased incidences of e-coli
contamination. Corn is a grass.
|
| Seed/biotech
companies have monopolistic business practices. |
·1 Most seeds are patented because of the
way the propagate; they can be reproduced by replanting each year.
·2 Seed/technology companies spent
hundreds of millions of dollars to develop patented seeds that are
hugely popular with producers worldwide (as evidenced by their 97%
adoption rate for soybeans and 80% adoption rate for corn across
the U.S.)
·3 Major biotech providers have licensing
agreements for seed distribution and marketing with hundreds of
other companies.
·4 Farmers support patenting and
licensing agreements that protect the technology so farmers can
have the highest yielding technology in the world and maintain
global competitiveness.
·5 Farmers in the movie "not able to
speak" about the saving seed saving are prohibited from doing so
for legal reasons, not because of corporate power. The farmers
shown are accused of knowingly saving a patented technology; a
crime in the U.S.
|
| Former
corporate employees are working for or have worked for the USDA and
the FDA, and doing the company's bidding there. |
·1 The employment of former
technology or other corporate employees in government has more to
do with the fact that these employees are highly trained in the
relevant technologies needed by regulators to appropriately
regulate the food system than anything else.
·2 Government jobs typically pay
significantly less than what these individuals would have made in
the private sector.
|
Conclusion: The film does not attack farmers directly; rather, it
focuses its attention on multinational agricultural and food companies.
While the film makes some supportive comments about farmers and includes
a sound recommendation that consumers should "know more" about your
food, its inaccuracies attack modern farm practices (e.g., that how
cattle are fed, raised, and processed in the U.S. causes e-coli
contamination). The modern food system is positioned as a corrupt, evil
industry that is harming employees, animals, and consumers while using
its power and influence to hide its business practices from view. These
accusations are simply not true.
Helpful Sources:
Corn is a Grass http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=104207
E-coli in Spinach http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2006/september/
Gassing Tomatoes http://my.dietpower.com/features/good_tomato.php
Kitchen Health http://www.chefdepot.net/sanitation.htm
Industry Websites: (developed in response to the film's
assertions)
www.cattlenetwork.com/Content.asp?ContentID=320996
www.monsanto.com/foodinc/
www.nationalchickencouncil.com/pressroom/pr_details.cfm?id=114
www.safefoodinc.com
|

|
|
|
|